Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

ISSN 2196-5625 CN 32-1884/TK

Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Optimal Power Flow of Distribution Networks Embedded with Renewable Energy and Storage Devices
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China;2.Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark;3.Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
    Abstract:

    This study proposes a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based approach to analyze the optimal power flow (OPF) of distribution networks (DNs) embedded with renewable energy and storage devices. First, the OPF of the DN is formulated as a stochastic nonlinear programming problem. Then, the multi-period nonlinear programming decision problem is formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP), which is composed of multiple single-time-step sub-problems. Subsequently, the state-of-the-art DRL algorithm, i.e., proximal policy optimization (PPO), is used to solve the MDP sequentially considering the impact on the future. Neural networks are used to extract operation knowledge from historical data offline and provide online decisions according to the real-time state of the DN. The proposed approach fully exploits the historical data and reduces the influence of the prediction error on the optimization results. The proposed real-time control strategy can provide more flexible decisions and achieve better performance than the pre-determined ones. Comparative results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

    图1 Overall structure of proposed approach for optimization.Fig.1
    图2 Topology of DN for case study.Fig.2
    图3 Cumulative reward during training procedure.Fig.3
    图4 PSC and cost of power loss during training procedure.Fig.4
    图5 Cost of power loss with four different methods on five consecutive test days.Fig.5
    图6 Comparison results on low-wind-speed day. (a) Changes in load demand and wind power. (b) Cost of power loss with four different methods.Fig.6
    表 1 Table 1
    表 3 Table 3
    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 31,2020
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: September 28,2021
  • Published: